Most Statisticians Have Been Asked To Falsify Scientific Data, Reveals Alarming New Survey

Governed by a methodical process of repeated observation and experimentation and inspired by the lofty philosophical principles of rationalism and objectivity, it’s easy to think of science as an infallible and incorruptible tool with which to explore pure truths about the universe. But in fact, scientific research is and (until the robots take over) always will be a human endeavor. Long story short, it’s important to consider science results carefully because separating conclusions from the lingering effects of our biases and egos is difficult, and humans have a tendency to simply up and cheat when things don’t go as expected.  

A new study in the Annals of Internal Medicine revealed that more than half of the biostatisticians surveyed had been asked by researchers to severely manipulate or falsify data in the past five years. These requests for “inappropriate analysis and reporting” covered a broad range of unethical number-fudging tactics, including removing or altering records to better support the research hypothesis, shifting secondary outcomes to sound like the primary outcome, and modifying measurement scales for some desired results.

Biostatisticians are specialized scientists who translate experimental datasets into comprehensible figures and calculate the degree to which the findings support the research team’s hypothesis. As such, many less-than-scrupulous researchers will try to enhance the apparent outcome of their studies by changing or cherry-picking data during the analysis process.

The authors – whose data analysis is hopefully trustworthy – were inspired to conduct their study after finding that only one other survey quantifying shady requests made to biostatisticians had been published, and that was back in 1998. For their own survey, authors Min Qi Wang, Alice Yan, and Ralph Katz sent online questionnaires to 800 randomly selected members of the American Statistical Association. Information from the 390 biostatisticians who completed the questionnaire was used in the analysis.

Recommended For You

Instant eCom Funnels LITE

Done For You eCom Product Funnels In Less Than 60 Seconds! Perfect for dropshippers who want to avoid expensive Shopify fees!

SQZin Leads machine

Generate Qualified Leads From Popular Content with Your Call-To-Action Overlay Without Having To Write A Single Word!|Squeeze – Share – Profit! You know that content is king and that high-quality content leads to the best conversions.

IM VIP Training - Trial 2018 - OTO

IM VIP Training - Trial 2018 - Over 240 Marketing Lessons, 16 Modules, Live Webinar Training, Software, Plugins, Templates Plus Much More.

Alice Yan
Wang et al./Annals of Internal Medicine, 2018

According to the responses, 79 percent of biostatisticians aged 23 to 39 had been asked, at least once, to commit one of the eight worst statistics integrity no-nos (a ranking determined in another part of the questionnaire) in the past five years. Seventy-eight percent of those 40-59 years old and 54 percent of those 60-88 years old had received such requests.

And while, as the authors note, “our survey provides no data on whether the request reflected researchers’ maleficence or inadequate knowledge about statistical and research methods”, several of the manipulations are impossible to dress up as anything other than blatant fraud. For example, 3 percent of the statisticians had been asked at least once to falsify the statistical significance in order to support the desired result, and a whopping 24 percent had been asked to remove or change information to better support the research hypothesis.

Wang, Yan, and Katz conclude that the best way to reduce the number of these requests in the future is to change the toxic scientific publishing culture. “[T]hese findings should be used to encourage research universities and companies to develop or improve institutional efforts to reduce workplace- and publication-related stress to alleviate the pressure that may be contributing to these inappropriate requests.”

[H/T: American Council of Science and Health]

Original Article : HERE ; This post was curated & posted using : RealSpecific

Recommended For You

Local Business Bundle Vol.2 (Single License FE)

10 Local Business WordPress Theme Bundle

Leads2List Elite Yearly

Leads2list captures leads from Facebook as per the niche you have set in. These leads are sought in a perfectly legit manner and rest assured the process is 100% GDPR complaint.Once the leads have been harvested Leads2list then feeds them straight into

Thank you for taking the time to read our article.

If you enjoyed our content, we'd really appreciate some "love" with a share or two.

And ... Don't forget to have fun!

Recommended Products

VidViral Pro

Download and work with HD Videos (720p) Add subtitle on footer instead of static text. Add Border to Videos in any color/gradient Add logo and watermark on the video. Change BG Image Video to gif app

EZ Review Videos - Upgrade Package

Unlocks 120 additional templates inside EZ Review Videos.

Leave a Reply